Hello Readers, it has been too long. Quickly catching up: I spent a large chunk of last semester trying to get acquainted with Moltmann. One of the prevalent issues I encountered and that was in my mind at the outset (primarily because of this) was the need to make sense of how Moltmann’s theology has changed. While I am still wading in the waters here I think I’m beginning to understand why this somewhat common “problem” among major theologians is especially vexing when it comes to Moltmann. In my final essay for my independent study I began to flesh out my understanding of whether/how Moltmann changed through examining how he related certain elements in his thought throughout his career-a type of test case essentially. Since that essay is still pretty raw and I hope to develop it for publication, I will hold off for now on that and simply turn to you readers: what do you think?
My Reading Habits
- @talkhoops would they move Pek if they got 1 or 2? Could they? 1 hour ago
- @HPbasketball not the 1st to say it, but... SAS v. Dallas last yr killed that idea 8 hours ago
- @JonesOnTheNBA think you're over correcting now. Can't know this either. EX: maybe Thibs heavy minutes lead to injuries that alter career 12 hours ago
Steve on Catch Up & a Question Etsuko on Free Karl Barth Lectures! spiritual life coach… on Contemporary European Views of… 4 minute abs on Habits of a Graduate Stud… stephania6783.braves… on Narcissism & Evangelical…